Summary
The rising curiosity and success in deploying inherited microorganisms and cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) for vector management methods necessitate an evidence of the CI mechanism. Wolbachia-induced CI manifests within the type of embryonic lethality when sperm from Wolbachia-bearing testes fertilize eggs from uninfected females. Embryos from contaminated females nevertheless survive to maintain the maternally inherited symbiont. Beforehand in Drosophila melanogaster flies, we demonstrated that CI modifies chromatin integrity in growing sperm to bestow the embryonic lethality. Right here, we validate these findings utilizing wMel-transinfected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes launched to regulate vector-borne illnesses. As soon as once more, the prophage WO CI proteins CifA and CifB goal male gametic nuclei to change chromatin integrity by way of an aberrant histone-to-protamine transition. Cifs will not be detected within the embryo, and thus elicit CI by way of the nucleoprotein modifications established pre-fertilization. The rescue protein CifA in oogenesis localizes to stem cell, nurse cell, and oocyte nuclei, in addition to embryonic DNA throughout embryogenesis. Discovery of the nuclear concentrating on Cifs and altered histone-to-protamine transition in each Aedes aegypti mosquitoes and D. melanogaster flies affirms the Host Modification Mannequin of CI is conserved throughout these host species. The research additionally newly uncovers the cell biology of Cif proteins within the ovaries, CifA localization within the embryos, and an impaired histone-to-protamine transition throughout spermiogenesis of any mosquito species. Total, these sperm modification findings might allow future optimization of CI efficacy in vectors or pests which can be refractory to Wolbachia transinfections.
Quotation: Kaur R, Meier CJ, McGraw EA, Hillyer JF, Bordenstein SR (2024) The mechanism of cytoplasmic incompatibility is conserved in Wolbachia-bearing Aedes aegypti mosquitoes deployed for arbovirus management. PLoS Biol 22(3):
e3002573.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002573
Educational Editor: Mariana Federica Wolfner, Cornell College, UNITED STATES
Acquired: November 20, 2023; Accepted: March 1, 2024; Printed: March 28, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Kaur et al. That is an open entry article distributed underneath the phrases of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows unrestricted use, distribution, and replica in any medium, offered the unique creator and supply are credited.
Knowledge Availability: All related knowledge are inside the paper and its Supporting information recordsdata.
Funding: This work was funded by Nationwide Institutes of Well being Awards R01 AI132581 and AI143725 to S.R.B., Nationwide Institute of Allergy and Infectious Illnesses R56 AI155573-01A1 to E.A.M., and Nationwide Science Basis Award 1949145 to J.F.H. The funders had no position in research design, knowledge assortment and evaluation, choice to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing pursuits: I’ve learn the journal’s coverage and the authors of this manuscript have the next competing pursuits: S.R.B. and R.Okay. are listed as inventors on patents or provisional patents associated to this work.
Abbreviations:
AED,
after egg deposition; CI,
cytoplasmic incompatibility; CTCF,
corrected complete cell fluorescence; HM,
Host Modification; PTM,
posttranslational modification; SP,
spermathecae; WMP,
World Mosquito Program
Introduction
Symbiotic biocontrol is a multifaceted technique that makes use of microorganisms for constructive well being outcomes [1]. With the potential to avoid wasting hundreds of thousands of lives when utilized at a scale to world illnesses, this strategy is very promising. One instance is the current, worldwide success of deploying an intracellular bacterium of the alphaproteobacterial genus Wolbachia in mosquitoes to scale back the transmission of assorted RNA arboviruses to people. Wolbachia specific 2 key phenotypes in these management methods. The primary is a virus-blocking trait [2,3] that reduces the replication of RNA viruses similar to dengue, Zika, and Chikungunya within the salivary glands of virus-transmitting mosquito females [4–9]. The second is a symbiotic drive system termed cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) that ends in embryonic lethality when Wolbachia-infected males mate with uninfected females [10]. The lethality outcomes from catastrophic paternal defects in early embryogenesis together with failure in condensation and segregation of paternal chromosomes, chromatin bridging, shredding of the paternal nuclei, early embryonic arrest, regional mitotic failures, and nuclear fallout [11–18]. Females carrying the identical pressure of Wolbachia rescue this lethality, thereby conferring a robust health benefit that spreads Wolbachia in pure host populations [19–22]. The World Mosquito Program (WMP) and others leverage each the virus-blocking and CI traits of the wMel pressure of Wolbachia from Drosophila melanogaster by stably transinfecting it into disease-transmitting Aedes aegypti mosquitoes that don’t naturally carry Wolbachia [23,24]. Mass releases of those wMel-carrying mosquitoes result in the conditional unfold of Wolbachia by way of CI when the bacterial frequency exceeds an unstable equilibrium [25]. Certainly, upon profitable releases, the WMP demonstrated 40% to 98% reductions in native dengue instances worldwide [26–33].
In transinfected Ae. aegypti mosquito hosts, Wolbachia induces robust CI [23,25,34] not like within the pure host D. melanogaster the place CI power varies [35–43]. Variation in CI power can rely on varied elements similar to Wolbachia ranges in testes [44], host age [35–40], temperature [40–43], maternal symbiont densities [45], and related to this research, completely different Wolbachia genotypes interacting of their pure versus synthetic host programs. As an illustration, in D. simulans, wRi induces almost full CI, whereas wNo and wHa strains induce decrease ranges of CI [46]. Within the parasitoid wasp genus of Nasonia, wVitA of N. vitripennis causes incomplete CI in its native host however almost full CI in a associated sibling host N. giraulti [47]. Whether or not completely different molecular mechanisms of CI function by the identical Wolbachia in diverse hosts stays unknown and is the topic of this research.
The genetic foundation of wMel cytoplasmic incompatibility is easy with 2 CI issue genes, cifA and cifB, encoded by WO prophage areas within the wMel genome, whose twin transgenic expression in D. melanogaster testes causes CI, and cifA expression alone in ovaries rescues CI [14,48,49]. On the mobile stage, CifwMel proteins act pre-fertilization to impair the histone—protamine transition throughout sperm growth and set up CI [50]. Notably, neither of the CifwMel proteins had been detected as paternally transferred to the fertilized Drosophila embryos. An identical research examined localization of wPip Cif proteins from Culex pipiens within the non-native host D. melanogaster. Utilizing transgenic flies, a international CifBwPip variant in mature CI sperm transfers to the embryo upon fertilization and associates with paternal DNA replication stress [51]. Nevertheless, paternal chromatin modifications established pre-fertilization in testes and in a wild-type host-Wolbachia system weren’t investigated [51].
Right here, we requested the query whether or not or not wMel transinfected into Aedes aegypti recapitulates the cell organic proof in flies, particularly for host modifications of nucleoprotein abundance in growing sperm and the dearth of paternal CifB switch to the embryo. This work thus checks if Cif proteins from the identical pressure of Wolbachia act mechanistically equal in native fly versus non-native mosquito hosts [52,53]. We used the WMP’s Ae. aegypti mosquitoes transinfected with wMel for almost all of the experiments and Ae. aegypti mosquitoes transinfected with the carefully associated variant wMelM [24]. Each strains induce robust CI with 100% identification within the cifA and cifB gene sequences. We report that outcomes principally recapitulated our earlier findings within the native, wMel-infected D. melanogaster host [50]. Throughout mosquito spermiogenesis, wMel Cifs influence paternal chromatin group by modifying the abundance of histone and protamine nucleoproteins. Paternal switch of Cif proteins to the fertilized mosquito embryos was not noticed, indicating the sperm modified pre-fertilization set up the paternal-effect lethality of embryos. We additional report that CifA happens in oocytes and embryos of wMel-infected feminine mosquitoes that rescue CI, which is a brand new commentary since CifA was not detectable in D. melanogaster embryos. We reconcile these completely different findings within the dialogue. Total, the CI/rescue drive system on the coronary heart of vector management efforts is dependent upon nuclear concentrating on Cif proteins in testes and ovaries. Ensuing modification of growing sperm results in a disrupted histone-to-protamine transition and thus altered sperm chromatin integrity.
Outcomes
wMel CifA and CifB proteins in Ae. aegypti goal nuclei of growing sperm
To look at the mobile localization of wMel Cif proteins throughout sperm growth, we used our developed CifwMel antibodies in Ae. aegypti males [50]. Testes group in Ae. aegypti resembles a follicle with completely different compartments termed cysts (Fig 1) [54,55]. From the apical finish to the bottom of a testis, cysts progressively improve in dimension and maturity in order that smaller compartments with undifferentiated spermatogonia are discovered on apical finish, whereas bigger cysts containing mature sperm are situated on the base or the distal finish. As maturation proceeds within the testes, spermatogonia develop, proliferate, and differentiate into spermatocytes. Spermatocytes then enter meiosis to generate haploid spermatids, which lastly turn into spermatozoa by way of cytodifferentiation in a course of referred to as spermiogenesis. The dramatic reworking of the initially leaf-shaped spermatids contains nuclear condensation and elongation forming a sperm head and tail reverse to it. Lastly, after individualization, the needle-shaped spermatids turn into mature sperm and launch into the seminal vesicle [54,55].
Fig 1. CifA and CifB exhibit cytoplasmic and nuclear localizations throughout sperm growth in Aedes aegypti.
Schematic illustration of Ae. aegypti male mosquito and magnified reproductive system created with Biorender.com is proven on the highest. From the apical finish to the bottom of a testis, cysts progressively improve in dimension and maturity in order that smaller compartments with undifferentiated spermatogonia are discovered on the apical finish, whereas bigger cysts containing mature sperm are situated on the base or the distal finish. Wolbachia-infected (wMel+) testes (n = 10) from 4 to five days previous virgin males had been dissected and immunostained to visualise CI proteins—CifA (inexperienced) and CifB (pink), throughout sperm morphogenesis. DAPI stain (blue) was used to label host nuclei. (I) On the apical finish of testes, CifA localizes to germline stem cell nuclei (white circles) with faint alerts within the cytoplasm, whereas CifB is strictly within the cytoplasm. (II) Each CifA and CifB localize within the cytoplasm of mitotic spermatocytes within the development section and (III) migrate to the nuclei of postmeiotic leaf-stage spermatids, indicating CifA’s cytonuclear change conduct. (IV–V) Within the later differentiating phases of spermiogenesis, the elongating spermatids harbor CifA surrounding the nuclear periphery, which then strips down alongside the sperm tail throughout the tightly compacted, individualized, needle-stage spermatid formation. CifB, however, decorates the nuclear heads throughout elongation and penetrates the condensed needle stage nuclei. (VI) Upon full maturation, CifA is on the sperm tail (arrows), and CifB localizes within the type of dense punctae in each mature sperm head (arrowheads) and tail (arrows). Sometimes, CifA’s presence in mature sperm head and never the tail was additionally detected in 2 out of 10 testes examined, with an analogous puncta-based localization sample of CifB (S1A Fig). CifA and CifB alerts are absent in Wolbachia-uninfected (wMel−) damaging management mosquitoes (S1B Fig). The experiment was repeated twice independently.
We discovered that CifA localized within the nuclei of germline stem cells on the apical finish of testes, whereas CifB occurred within the surrounding cytoplasm in 4 to five days previous virgin mosquito males (Fig 1). In spermatocytes, each CifA and CifB had been cytoplasmic after which acutely transported to the nuclei of postmeiotic leaf stage spermatids, depicting a cytonuclear switch throughout the sperm morphogenesis course of. Upon elongation, CifA localized to the cytoplasmic periphery of elongating spermatids, suggesting shuttling of the protein again to the cytoplasm, whereas CifB remained nuclear. After nuclear compaction, CifA stripped down alongside the tails of needle-shaped spermatids, and CifB remained colocalized with the spermatid head. Mature sperm extracted from the distal finish of the testes demonstrated CifA remained with the sperm tail and CifB occurred with each the pinnacle and tail of sperm. CifA’s presence in all of the sperm heads was noticed in 2/10 testes examined in a single experimental run (S1A Fig). Since Wolbachia weren’t current within the mature sperm, these outcomes specify that Cif proteins are secreted out of bacterial cells to invade and work together with nuclei and cytoplasm of growing sperm cells. In Wolbachia-uninfected (wMel-) management testes, no CifA and CifB alerts had been detected, as anticipated (S1B Fig).
wMel hijacks the evolutionary-conserved, histone-to-protamine transition of growing sperm
Correct sperm chromatin integrity is essential for profitable fertilization and embryogenesis. Throughout spermiogenesis, histone-bound chromatin is substituted by protamine-bound one which tightly condenses sperm DNA to bundle the sperm head [56]. Nevertheless, mispackaged sperm on account of an irregular histone-to-protamine transition could cause male infertility and embryonic lethality in various programs from bugs to mice [57,58]. Thus, to characterize Cifs’ influence on the growing sperm chromatin group of Ae. aegypti, we first investigated histone dynamics in contaminated (wMel+) and uninfected (wMel-) testes utilizing an antibody concentrating on core histones conserved by sequence and construction throughout eukaryotes [59,60]. We discovered 2.01-fold considerably increased core histone depth in wMel+ elongating spermatids (median = 3,764) in comparison with wMel- (median = 1,867) (Fig 2A and 2B and S1 Table). The elevated histone retention persevered within the type of puncta on the wMel+ needle spermatid (Figs 2A and S2). Upon isolating mature sperm out of the testes, we persistently discovered a marked and vital improve within the proportion of wMel+ sperm (median = 92.5%) with retained histone puncta in comparison with wMel- (median = 0%) (Fig 2A and 2C and S1 Table). To detect whether or not the irregular histone retention in mature sperm is related to compounding errors within the histone-to-protamine transition, we used the fluorochrome chromomycin A3 (CMA3) stain that fluoresces upon binding to protamine-deficient areas of DNA [61]. Mature sperm remoted from wMel+ exhibited an analogous 2.1-fold vital improve in CMA3 depth in keeping with protamine deficiency (median = 361.1) relative to wMel− (median = 169.7) (Fig 2D and 2E and S1 Table). Notably, that is the primary characterization of an impaired histone-to-protamine transition by means of spermiogenesis in a mosquito species.
Fig 2. Maturing CI sperm abnormally retain histones and lack protamines.
(A) wMel+ and wMel- testes (n = 10) from 4 to five days previous virgin males had been dissected and immunostained to visualise and quantify histone abundance (magenta) in elongating spermatids and mature sperm throughout sperm morphogenesis in Ae. aegypti. DAPI stain (blue) was used to label spermatid nuclei. (A, B) Throughout the elongating stage, wMel+ males present increased core histones sign depth than in wMel- males. (A, C) Within the late maturation phases, wMel+ males present extended histone retention within the type of puncta in condensing needle-stage spermatids and particular person mature sperms, whereas histones are eliminated in wMel- males as anticipated. A full uncropped picture of needle spermatids with retained histones in wMel+ versus wMel- testes is proven in S2 Fig. (D) Absolutely mature sperm had been extracted from wMel+ and wMel- testes (n = 10) of 4 to five days previous virgin males and stained with fluorescent CMA3 (inexperienced) for detection of protamine deficiency. Sign depth in every particular person sperm nucleus head was quantified in ImageJ (see Methods) and graphed. wMel+ sperm present enhanced protamine deficiency ranges in comparison with wMel− management. Horizontal bars in (B), (C), and (E) characterize median worth. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was decided by operating pairwise comparisons based mostly on Kolmogorov—Smirnov take a look at. All of the p-values are reported in S1 Table. The experiments had been carried out in 2 impartial organic replicates. Uncooked knowledge underlying this determine may be present in S1 Data file.
Protamine-deficient sperm journey with Cifs to the feminine reproductive tract
To analyze if sperm chromatin modifications and Cif proteins switch paternally to females after mating, we crossed freshly hatched virgin wMel+ or wMel- males with virgin wMel- females in single pair mating. People mated for 4 days to make sure mating. On day 5, the reproductive tract of females along with the spermathecae (SP)—a set of three inflexible capsules that retailer, defend, and nourish sperm [62]—had been dissected, and SPs had been squashed to disentangle the sperm mass (Fig 3A). CI-sperm derived from wMel+ males transferred to SP of mated wMel- females confirmed a 1.37-fold vital improve in protamine deficiency (median = 2,717.43) in comparison with sperm derived from wMel- males (median = 1,974.29) (Fig 3B and 3C and S1 Table). Following Cif antibody staining, we detected CifA on the sperm tail and CifB on the sperm head and tail (Fig 3D), much like their localization sample in sperm remoted from testes (Fig 1). Utilizing the histone antibody, we detected no histone alerts on sperm remoted from females mated with each wMel+ and wMel- males (Fig 3D), suggesting that histone retention is short-term as a result of they could be misplaced or degraded earlier than mating or throughout switch to the feminine SP.
Fig 3. Protamine deficiency and Cifs persist in mature sperm transferred to spermathecae of uninfected females, whereas histones don’t.
(A) Schematic illustration of Ae. aegypti feminine reproductive system, created with BioRender.com that exhibits ovaries (OV) and spermatheca (SP), the specialised sperm storage organ. wMel+ and wMel− males had been mated in single pair to wMel− females. Females had been then dissected, and transferred sperm had been launched by puncturing SP. (B) Particular person sperm head depth quantification exhibits that sperm protamine deficiency from wMel+ males persist after switch within the females in comparison with that of wMel- males. Horizontal bars characterize median worth. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was decided by operating pairwise comparisons based mostly on Kolmogorov—Smirnov take a look at. The p-values are reported in S1 Table and uncooked knowledge underlying panel B of this determine may be present in S1 Data file. (C) Consultant photographs of CMA3-stained mature sperm (arrows) transferred from wMel- and wMel+ males in wMel- feminine reproductive programs are proven. (D) Remoted sperm from females had been immunostained for localizing CifA (inexperienced), CifB (pink), and histones (magenta). DAPI stain (blue) was used to label nuclei. In sperm derived from wMel+ males, CifA is predominantly seen alongside the sperm tail and CifB on each sperm head and tail. Each CifA and CifB alerts are absent in sperm from wMel- males. Histone puncta earlier detected in mature sperm from wMel+ testes will not be current in sperm extracted from feminine tract (arrows). All of the experiments had been carried out in 2 impartial organic replicates.
Paternal CifA and CifB will not be detected in CI embryos; maternal CifA is current in rescue embryos
As soon as fertilization happens, the canonical mobile penalties of CI are delayed paternal chromatin condensation, paternal chromatin bridges, and segregation defects leading to early, and in some instances, mid-stage embryonic arrest [12–14,17,18,63–67]. In Ae. aegypti, the male pronucleus is fashioned inside 1 h after fertilization, adopted by apposition and a pair of successive mitotic divisions producing 4 nuclei between 1 and a pair of h [68]. By 3 h, asynchrony of nuclear divisions happens the place mitotic nuclei in varied phases of divisions are broadly scattered over the deutoplasm, the yolk reserve of the egg.
To analyze if paternal Cif proteins loaded within the sperm head and tail switch to the embryos after fertilization, we carried out 3 crosses: wMel+ males × wMel- females (CI cross), wMel+ males × wMel+ females (Rescue cross), and wMel- males × wMel- females (damaging management). We collected embryos in 0 to three h intervals after egg deposition (AED) adopted by immunostaining. In roughly 1.5 h previous CI embryos, the anticipated chromatin catastrophes occurred, together with fragmented DNA (Fig 4A) and under-condensed nuclear DNA partially scattered within the egg yolk cytoplasm (Fig 4A’). Importantly, neither CifA nor CifB was detected in CI embryos, whereas management histone alerts had been noticed colocalizing with nuclear DNA. These outcomes point out that Cifs are seemingly not paternally delivered by way of sperm to the mosquito embryo, much like our earlier findings in flies [50].
Fig 4. CifA and CifB will not be paternally delivered to the Ae. aegypti CI embryos; CifA is detected within the rescue embryos.
Immunofluorescence of CifA (inexperienced) and CifB (pink) was carried out in 1–3 h previous, fertilized Ae. aegypti embryos (n = 15) every obtained from CI cross (wMel+ male × wMel− feminine), rescue cross (wMel+ male × wMel+ feminine), and damaging management cross (wMel- male × wMel- feminine). Host DNA was labeled with DAPI (blue), and core histone (magenta) was used as a constructive antibody management. In 1–1.5 h AED previous CI embryos, (A) nuclei fragmentation and (A’) shredding traits had been noticed (arrowheads). Histone alerts had been detected colocalizing with host DNA, whereas no CifA and CifB alerts delivered from paternal sperm had been detected. Dotted field is drawn across the chromosomal DNA with magnified view proven within the inset on the higher proper nook. (B) In roughly 1 h AED previous rescue embryos, CifA localizes in and across the periphery of chromosomal DNA putatively separating at metaphase. (B’) At roughly 2 h AED throughout nuclear cycle 3, CifA localizes with nuclear DNA and surrounding cytoplasm of 8 daughter cells in rescue embryos (S3 Fig). (C, C’) Roughly 1 h previous damaging management embryos confirmed constructive histone alerts colocalizing with chromosomal DNA and absence of each CifA and CifB, as anticipated. (D, D’) Additional, to research whether or not CifA and CifB might bind within the fertilized rescue embryo, we used each antibodies collectively (see Methods) and as soon as once more validated no switch of paternal CifB and constant nuclear and peripheral alerts of maternal CifA. We word the autofluorescence on account of yolk fats cells and inexperienced dots are background noise seemingly as a result of presence of unwashed residual antibody.
In roughly 1 h previous rescue embryos, we noticed synkaryon that types after maternal and paternal pronucleus appose one another. Maternally derived CifA partially overlapped with DNA and predominantly concentrated across the periphery of a putative group of chromosomes on the metaphase (Fig 4B). The top of the third nuclear cycle in roughly 2 h previous rescue embryo resulted in 8 daughter nuclei, the place CifA is detected in and round every daughter cell nucleus (Figs 4B’ and S3). Within the damaging management roughly 1 h previous embryos, histone alerts colocalized with segregating chromosomal DNA, and no CifA and CifB alerts had been detected, as anticipated (Fig 4C and 4C’). We additionally examined whether or not CifA and CifB might bind collectively in early 1 to 2 h previous, fertilized rescue embryos by co-staining with each Cif antibodies (see Methods). Whereas constant alerts of CifA co-localized with DNA, there was no proof of CifB presence in embryos throughout preliminary and subsequent mitotic divisions (Fig 4D and 4D’). In late rescue embryos collected at roughly 3 h AED, we persistently detected concentrated patchy alerts of CifA adjoining the periphery of separating chromosomes at anaphase and within the cytoplasm of divided nuclei at 4 to five and later division cycles, respectively (Fig 5A and 5A’). In distinction, the CI embryos collected on the identical time confirmed disrupted nuclear divisions and no alerts of neither CifA nor CifB (Fig 5B and 5B’) indicating an absence of proof for paternal Cif switch to the fertilized embryos.
Fig 5. CifA stays connected to the chromosomes and in cytoplasmic periphery across the nuclei in late-stage rescue embryos, whereas CifB is undetected.
Late-stage CI and rescue embryos collected at roughly 3 h AED had been immunostained with CifA and CifB antibodies. We persistently detected concentrated patchy alerts of CifA adjoining the periphery of separating chromosomes at anaphase and within the cytoplasm of divided nuclei at 4 to five and later division cycles, respectively (Fig 5A and 5A’). In distinction, the CI embryos collected on the identical time confirmed disrupted nuclear divisions and no alerts of neither CifA nor CifB (Fig 5B and 5B’).
If Cif expression in these early embryos is regulated by maternally inherited Wolbachia cells, then we anticipate gene expression ranges to be excessive for CifA and low for CifB. qPCR evaluation of cif gene expression in embryos carrying wMelM collected 0 to 2 h AED certainly affirm this expectation with an order of magnitude increased expression for cifA (S4 Fig). It stays doable that the CifB protein will not be translated as a result of low mRNA ranges detected. Another rationalization for the presence of CifA and absence of CifB in early rescue embryos is that CifA is inherited with maternal DNA from the oocyte to the embryo (see under part).
CifA localizes to the nuclei of germline stem cells, nurse cells, and oocyte throughout oogenesis in females.
The transgenic foundation of rescue is particularly depending on wMel CifA expression in fly and mosquito ovaries [48,49,69]. The in situ localization dynamics of CifA in mosquito ovaries has not been evaluated to this point. In contrast to Drosophila, oogenesis in Ae. aegypti happens in 2 phases (Fig 6A and 6B). The primary pre-vitellogenic stage happens earlier than females feed on blood and particularly associates with a rise in main ovarioles [70]. The second vitellogenic stage begins after blood feeding and associates with deposition of yolk proteins and lipids from the fats physique and RNA and proteins from nurse cells into growing oocytes [71,72]. Oocyte maturation then results in egg deposition [55,73]. In Ae. aegypti ovaries, dietary provisioning by way of the blood meal is essential since eggs can’t exogenously supply vitamins, and all dietary necessities for embryogenesis should be packaged throughout oogenesis [74].
Fig 6. In comparison with cytoplasmic Wolbachia and CifB within the Ae. aegypti ovaries, CifA displays nuclear localization in germarium, nurse cells and oocyte nuclei.
(A, B) Schematic illustration of Ae. aegypti ovary on the left illustrates the phases of oogenesis pre- and post-blood feeding, created with Biorender.com. Ovaries (n = 10) from 4 to five days previous females had been dissected earlier than and 24 h after blood feeding. (A’) Immunostaining assay exhibits that in non-blood fed wMel+ females, Wolbachia (yellow) and CifB (in pink) localize within the cytoplasm of germarium (ger), nurse cells and oocyte (oo). CifA (inexperienced), however, is current within the nuclei of germ cells and the peripheral cytoplasm of nurse cells within the main egg chamber (pec) indicated as white arrowheads. Sometimes, CifA happens in nurse cell nuclei (nn) (S4 Fig). Within the oocyte, CifA is nuclear (on) inhabiting nucleoplasm house containing chromatin mass (ch) and a nucleolus (no). CifA colocalizes with chromatin exterior of the nucleolus space. (B) After blood feeding, Wolbachia and CifB in wMel+ females stay cytoplasmic in germarium and on the periphery of nurse cells. CifA stays nuclear in germline stem cells, secondary egg chamber (sec), and nurse cells (arrowheads) in pec. After blood consumption, oocyte dimension grows dramatically full of yolk (black zone) within the pec. wMel- females earlier than and after blood feeding are devoid of any Wolbachia, CifA and CifB alerts, as anticipated (S5 Fig). Within the ovaries of each wMel+ and wMel- strains, we word that the sometimes noticed autofluorescence in pink, inexperienced, and yellow channels outlining the tissue morphology doesn’t signify Wolbachia, CifA, and CifB alerts, respectively.
We tracked wMel Wolbachia and CifA localization in ovaries earlier than and after blood feeding. In each blood fed and non-blood fed females, Wolbachia resided within the cytoplasm of germline stem cells, nurse cells, and the oocyte, as anticipated (Figs 6 and S5). In distinction, CifA localization was primarily nuclear. Earlier than blood feeding, CifA occurred in stem cell nuclei within the germarium (GSCs) and within the cytoplasm close to follicle cells and nurse cells within the main egg chamber (Fig 6A’). Sometimes, CifA was detected colocalizing with nurse cell nuclei (n = 3/10 ovaries examined) (S6 Fig). The Ae. aegypti mosquito oocyte contains an unusual nucleus with 2 distinct our bodies—nucleolus and chromosomal mass [75,76]. Within the oocyte nucleus, CifA inhabits the nucleoplasm containing the chromatin mass and doesn’t enter within the nucleolus (Figs 6A’ and S6). CifA’s presence within the oocyte nucleus along with the nuclear chromosomal mass suggests its potential interplay with maternal chromatin early in oogenesis, presumably to prime the rescue course of. We additionally tracked CifB localization that, like Wolbachia, was discovered strictly cytoplasmic round germline stem cells, nurse cells, and oocyte nuclei (Fig 6A’).
After blood feeding, as vitellogenesis proceeds the first egg chamber will increase in dimension on account of oocyte filled with non-staining yolk particles. CifA persevered within the GSCs and nurse cell nuclei, whereas CifB remained cytoplasmic surrounding the periphery of nurse cell nuclei in main egg chamber (Fig 6B’). Within the massive oocyte, we didn’t detect both of the proteins seemingly as a result of the antibody didn’t penetrate by means of the vitelline membrane in a whole-mount insect tissue preparation [77–79]. Total, the outcomes point out that CifA targets the nuclei of ovarian germline, nurse cells, and oocyte in a fashion that might facilitate host nuclear modification for rescue both earlier in oogenesis or embryogenesis. The discovering additionally corroborated the invention of CifA’s nuclear localization sign, which isn’t current in CifB [50].
Dialogue
Massive-scale deployments of Wolbachia symbiont in Ae. aegypti mosquitoes end in inhabitants substitute of Wolbachia-uninfected mosquitoes with wMel symbiotic people, and concordantly, a 40% to 98% discount in native dengue instances. This comparatively new technique for arboviral illness management is a wonderful instance of deploying microbial symbionts for constructive well being outcomes, and it’s seemingly extendable to agriculture well being by lowering the burden of crop infectious illnesses as properly [80]. The primary purpose of our research was to decipher the mobile and molecular mechanisms of the wMel CI drive system accountable in main half for the inhabitants substitute success tales of the WMP. We report under beforehand unknown elements of mosquito reproductive biology in relation to symbiotic management: (i) The CI-causing Cif proteins from wMel Wolbachia invade nuclei of growing sperm of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes and trigger an irregular histone-to-protamine transition—a conserved and important step for regular sperm metamorphosis and genome packaging [56,81]. (ii) Histone—protamine dynamics had been obscure in mosquitoes, and this work gives the primary characterization of this transition underneath the affect of wMel Wolbachia in a mosquito host species related for human well being. (iii) Mature sperm with protamine deficiency are transferred to the feminine spermatheca (SP) along with Cif proteins, nevertheless, neither CifA nor CifB switch from SP to the uninfected embryos. (iv) In wMel+ ovaries, CifA has nuclear localization, whereas CifB is cytoplasmic earlier than and after blood feeding. (v) Fertilized embryos derived from wMel+ females present CifA localization within the nuclei of early mitotic stage and on the nuclear periphery within the cytoplasm throughout late division cycles. (vi) Importantly, there isn’t a colocalization or binding of CifA and CifB within the fertilized embryos.
We detected a couple of variations in wMel Cifs’ localization within the transinfected Ae. aegypti mosquitoes in comparison with our earlier work proven within the pure host of D. melanogaster flies [50]. Throughout pre-meiotic spermatogenesis stage, CifB was not detected within the germ cells in Drosophila, whereas in Ae. aegypti, CifB localizes to the germline cytoplasm. Each CifA and CifB are nuclear in fly spermatocytes however cytoplasmic in mosquitoes. Throughout post-meiosis and elongation stage in flies, CifA and CifB situated within the presumed acrosomal area of sperm head. In mosquitoes, CifA exits out of the elongating sperm head and localizes to the cytoplasmic periphery, and CifB decorates the sperm nuclei in a definite puncta method. Upon maturation, CifA strictly lies on the sperm tail and CifB happens with the pinnacle in dense puncta type and faint alerts alongside the tail. We hypothesize that the variations in localization in flies and mosquitoes is perhaps on account of species-specific variations in sperm morphogenesis or chromatin group and condensation processes [82,83]. Certainly, to detect Cifs in tightly packaged mature sperm, decondensation of mosquito sperm was not mandatory as completed beforehand in flies [50], suggesting that mosquitoes have a much less condensed sperm structure than flies regardless that they possess the identical sperm head diameter [84,85]. These variations might underpin the extent and specifics of the wMel protein—chromatin interactions in several host species.
Throughout the postmeiotic elongation course of, sperm chromatin undergoes a dramatic reorganization from a nucleosomal histone-based construction to a protamine-based construction. In accordance with our earlier knowledge [50], we right here present that the histone-to-protamine transition happens abnormally in wMel+ Ae. aegypti. In contrast to flies wherein retained histones had been detected solely till elongating late-canoe spermatids [50], punctate histones had been detected on the floor of mature mosquito sperm, highlighting as soon as once more the specie-specificity of wMel protein—chromatin interactions which may be suggestive of variable CI penetrance (fly host, transient histone retention) versus persistently robust CI (mosquito host, lengthy histone retention). We additional spotlight 19% increased protamine deficiency ranges in mosquitoes that correlates with their excessive CI ranges [23,25,34] in comparison with flies. The protamine deficiency adjustments additionally diverse in sperm remoted from females in wMel-Ae. aegypti versus wMel-D. mel. Whereas the CI mechanism usually stays conserved in these host species, there is perhaps further elements at play, similar to CI-related variation in sperm dimension, size, and species-specific sperm DNA compaction [55,83,84] that will have an effect on which sperm efficiently fertilize females. Future comparative investigations on sperm genome structure, relative nucleoprotamine structural group, and chromosomal association throughout insect species will likely be useful to find out the underlying elements that will clarify various CI penetrance.
After mating, sperm remoted from the feminine reproductive tract contained CifA alongside the tail and CifB adorned on the pinnacle and tail. Cifs weren’t detected within the fertilized embryo. There are 2 causes to clarify this outcome. The primary is organic, particularly that Cifs are shredded off the sperm floor earlier than embryos are fertilized. Certainly, the plasma membrane of mature sperm in mosquitoes and different animals is roofed by a thick glycoprotein coat or glycocalyx [86], which upon mating masks the sperm from an instantaneous feminine immune assault [87,88]. Inside 24 h of storage within the feminine reproductive tract, Ae. aegypti sperm shed their glycocalyx to turn into motile for fertilizing the egg [89]. Thus, it’s doable that Cifs are eliminated throughout glycocalyx processing or degraded earlier than sperm entry into the egg by means of exocytosis of acrosomal content material [90], as we mentioned beforehand [50]. The second motive generally is a technical problem of detecting Cifs because the proteins might not sufficiently stain in embryos maybe owing to their low abundance. Nevertheless, because the Cifs are detectable in mature sperm on the identical abundance anticipated inside eggs, this rationalization appears unlikely. Furthermore, CifA is detectable in rescue embryos on this research, thus demonstrating that the staining approach works in embryos. Future analysis might contain experiments with varied staining strategies.
Sustaining sperm genomic integrity is necessary not just for profitable fertilization and embryo growth, but additionally to make sure correct transmission of genetic data throughout generations. Throughout spermatogenesis, substitute of histones by protamines is facilitated by varied posttranslational modifications (PTMs). This transition can also be essentially the most susceptible section of spermatogenesis for the induction of DNA breaks adopted by an instantaneous restore course of for regulating chromatin compaction [81,91]. With inadequate PTMs and DNA restore, growing sperm accumulate errors within the epigenome that may transmit to the egg with necessary implications for the destiny of growing embryo [92–94]. As soon as fertilization happens, the transferred sperm with an imbalanced protamine content material might endure from reworking errors within the chromatin construction resulting in DNA breaks that ultimately trigger chromosome-type aberrations [95]. The restore of sperm DNA breaks is a key issue to make sure correct embryo growth, particularly when paternal DNA integrity is compromised [96–98]. In mice, zygotes acknowledge and reply to DNA injury derived from sperm by particularly delaying paternal DNA replication, inflicting retarded embryonic growth and finally developmental arrest [99]. Certainly, protamine elimination is unaffected in CI embryos, and it’s the paternal DNA replication which is delayed in CI sperm with retention of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, a replication stress marker [51,100].
Thus, we summarize our cell organic data of CI in gentle of the Host Modification mannequin (Fig 7), wherein wMel Cif proteins in males localize and work together with the growing sperm nucleus. Resultantly, the CI sperm develop with compromised RNA and DNA content material [101] and irregular histone retention and protamine deficiency in Drosophila melanogaster [50] and Ae. aegypti mosquitoes, noticed on this research. A disrupted substitute of histones might alter the epigenetic reminiscence of CI sperm that may be inherited to dictate the destiny of embryonic growth [102,103]. We speculate that post-fertilization, the modified CI sperm with imbalanced protamine content material expertise chromatin reworking defects resulting in improper condensation and replication errors. These errors ultimately trigger embryonic developmental arrest and lethality until rescued by doubtlessly comparable epigenetic adjustments imparted by wMel+ females expressing CifA throughout oogenesis and/or embryogenesis as mentioned under. The unmodified sperm from wMel- males will likely be appropriate with embryos derived from both modified (wMel+) or unmodified (wMel-) females as a result of maternal chromatin decides the speed of nuclear mitotic development [104].
Fig 7. Abstract of Host Modification Mannequin of cytoplasmic incompatibility.
In wMel-infected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes (wMel+), CifA and CifB proteins localize in postmeiotic spermatid nuclei. Upon elongation and maturation, whereas CifB resides within the sperm nucleus, CifA exits and localize to sperm tail. Throughout elongation, histones wrapped round spermatid DNA are usually eliminated and changed by protamines that bind and tightly bundle the sperm chromatin for sustaining compact genome integrity. In uninfected mosquitoes (wMel-), histone-to-protamine transition happen usually, whereas in wMel+ males, Cif proteins trigger irregular retention of histones and lack of protamine binding to the DNA. Sperm chromatin integrity altered pre-fertilization ends in post-fertilization embryonic disaster. Upon fertilizing an uninfected egg, the modified sperm chromatin fails to condense and synchronize with maternal chromatin throughout early mitotic divisions, inflicting CI-defining embryonic lethality. Nevertheless, the unmodified sperm from wMel- males will likely be appropriate with embryos derived from both modified (wMel+) or unmodified (wMel-) females as a result of maternal chromatin decides the speed of nuclear mitotic development. Picture was created with Biorender.com.
wMel CifA in Ae. aegypti females invade nuclei of germline stem cells, nurse cells, and the oocyte nucleoplasm containing the chromatin mass. These findings are strongly in keeping with the nuclear-targeting CifA harboring a purposeful nuclear localization sign beforehand reported in fly experiments [50]. Furthermore, CifA is biochemically characterised as a RNase [101], and Wolbachia is understood to trigger oxidative stress in Ae. aegypti ovaries [105]. Subsequently, it stays believable if unlikely that wMel CifA within the oocyte nucleus interacts with maternal chromatin and induces adjustments to finally sync with wMel-modified paternal chromatin to rescue CI (Fig 7). Certainly, in mammals, the oocyte is primed to restore genomic integrity of the fertilizing sperm by encoding transcripts which can be extra plentiful within the early embryo than within the later phases [106,107].
After fertilization, no Cif proteins had been detected in CI embryos, establishing that paternally encoded, wild-type Cifs are unlikely to switch to the embryo. It’s the deadly paternal genome modification that’s essential to be delivered and manifest CI. Strikingly, we discovered CifA presence in mosquito embryos derived from Wolbachia-infected females the place CifA overlaps with nuclei throughout early mitotic divisions and concentrates in and across the nuclear periphery and within the cytoplasm throughout later division cycles. Whereas the dearth of paternal wMel transgenic and wild-type CifA and CifB switch is a replicated outcome throughout flies and mosquitoes, the presence of CifA in mosquito embryos varies. CifA in flies was solely detectable till early oogenesis occasions; it was absent in embryos [50]. Nevertheless, in mosquitoes, it’s current and affiliated with DNA throughout early mitotic occasions of embryogenesis. We speculate that CifA’s presence within the oocyte nucleus of mosquito ovaries (and absence in fly oocytes) explains CifA switch to mosquito embryos. In affiliation with this distinction, we additionally word that the symbiont density, distribution, and expression of Wolbachia in new, transinfected hosts can change dramatically, impacting protein expression, localization, and host phenotypes. Certainly, wMel in Ae. aegypti is secure and has the next within-host density [34]. Whether or not CifA in mosquito embryos is maternally provisioned or embryonically expressed by Wolbachia cells requires additional investigation. Differential labeling of male versus feminine pronuclei with particular markers [108] might doubtlessly set up CifA localization to the feminine pronucleus whether it is maternally derived, or to each pronuclei if Wolbachia-derived.
Primarily based on D. melanogaster knowledge, we proposed a CifA-mediated Host Modification Mannequin of rescue whereby CifA modifies host elements throughout oogenesis (a parallel idea to the CI-induced testes modifications) to impart maternal chromatin adjustments, which then go all the way down to the zygote for rescue [49,50]. An up to date mannequin based mostly on the Ae. aegypti knowledge reported right here is that CifA proteins can entry and/or work together with maternal chromatin not solely throughout oogenesis, but additionally embryogenesis for maternal chromatin modification to persist and persistently rescue robust CI on this system. Certainly, in murine fashions, the zygote can restore compromised sperm DNA integrity utilizing maternal DNA restore equipment [109]. Nevertheless, we warning that it’s tough to check the proximal time and site of the rescue mechanism in a wild-type system the place Wolbachia are current in each the ovaries and embryos. Transgenic cif expression underneath the management of ovarian- or embryonic-specific expression might, in principle, tease these alternate options aside. On this gentle, it’s noteworthy that transgenic rescue is achieved with various CifA variants solely by ovarian expression (not embryonic expression) until date [14,49,69,110–112].
Lastly, the collective knowledge on wMel CI mobile biology [50] (and this research) in help of Host Modification (HM) mannequin of CI contrasts with that of wPip from Culex pipiens mosquitoes studied in a non-native D. melanogaster host [51]. Our in vivo proof in each flies and mosquitoes establishes that the CI-defining host modifications incipiently set up pre-fertilization, and deadly paternal genome modification is delivered to the embryo to manifest CI. CifAwMel and CifBwMel within the sperm very seemingly don’t switch to the embryos for inducing CI, and CifAwMel and CifBwMel don’t bind within the embryos for rescue. Then again, one other research [51] claims that the switch of CifBwPip toxin to the fertilized embryo related to paternal genome replication stress kills embryos. We spotlight that the interpretation of this outcome, whereas extendable to the premise that CifB causes paternal genome replication errors within the embryo, has another and extra parsimonious rationalization with the info right here. Specifically, the integrity of paternal DNA within the embryo is compromised pre-fertilization, which secondarily ends in post-fertilization replication stress. This speculation was not examined within the research [51]. Moreover, the research predicts that upon fertilization, the maternal CifAwPip ought to be current within the egg cytoplasm to bind paternally delivered CifBwPip and neutralize its toxicity for rescuing CI. There isn’t any cell organic proof for this basic premise of the toxin-antitoxin mannequin [51]. Notably, the host genotype can regulate induction and/or suppression of CI and rescue [38,113–115]. Subsequently, discrepancies in Cif protein switch and localization might outcome from a transgenic artifact. As an illustration, overexpressed, transgenic CifBwPip in a international fly host is more likely to act aberrantly from wild-type CifB, the latter of which was not measured in embryos from the pure host C. pipiens. Right here, utilizing the identical wMel pressure from native D. melanogaster in non-native Ae. aegypti hosts, we set up that the mechanism of CI in WMP mosquitoes is basically managed by the Wolbachia pressure as a result of histone retention, protamine deficiency, and lack of paternal CifA and/or CifB detection within the embryos are shared aspects of CI throughout each hosts.
CI is the symbiotic drive utilized by the WMP to quickly unfold Wolbachia and exchange the wild uninfected Ae. aegypti inhabitants to scale back their vectorial competence and enhance world well being. Whereas this work characterizes the long-sought mechanism of CI and its conservation throughout D. melanogaster and Ae. aegypti, it additionally raises the potential for leveraging the altered sperm nucleoprotein composition, if wanted, to genetically engineer and optimize CI in vectors or pests which can be both refractory to Wolbachia an infection or lack the capability for Wolbachia-induced CI.
Supplies and strategies
Mosquito strains
Aedes aegypti mosquito strains with and with out wMel Wolbachia an infection had been obtained first from Monash College (wMel) [23] for almost all of the work and subsequently from the College of Melbourne, Australia (wMelM) [24] for the qPCR-based cif expression experiments in embryos (S4 Fig). Each strains induce robust CI with 100% identification within the cifA and cifB gene sequences [24]. The colonies had been reared and maintained at Vanderbilt College and Penn State College, USA, in environmental chambers at 27 °C and 75% relative humidity on a 12-h gentle/darkish cycle. Eggs had been hatched in water and larvae fed a combination of Koi meals and baker’s yeast. Pupae from the wMel+ and wMel- colonies had been transferred to six-well plates, and upon eclosion, adults had been anesthetized on ice and separated by intercourse; this process prevented mating. Adults had been housed in 900 cm3 cages with display screen partitions and fed 10% sucrose advert libitum. The sexes had been maintained individually for experimental functions.
Immunofluorescence: Testes
Grownup virgin mosquito males (4 to five days previous) with and with out wMel had been collected for testes dissection in ice-cold 1× PBS resolution. Dissected tissues had been mounted in 4% formaldehyde diluted in 1× PBS for 30 min at room temperature and washed in PBS-T (1× PBS + 0.3% TritonX-100) 3 occasions for five min every. Tissues had been then blocked in 1% BSA in PBS-T (1× PBS + 0.1% TritonX-100) for 1 h at room temperature. They had been then incubated independently with main antibodies: anti-rabbit CifA (1:500), anti-rabbit CifB (1:500), and anti-mouse Histone (1:1,000) (Millipore Sigma, Cat# MABE71) in a single day at 4 °C rotating. After washing in PBS-T 3 occasions for five min every at room temperature, tissues had been incubated with secondary antibodies: goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 594 secondary antibody (Fisher Scientific, Cat# A11037) and goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A11034) at 1:1,000 dilution for 4 h at room temperature at the hours of darkness. Tissues had been then washed 3 occasions for five min every in PBS-T and mounted in Vectashield mounting media containing DAPI (Vector laboratories, Cat# H120010). Imaging was carried out underneath Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope underneath fixed publicity settings.
Sperm isolation and Chromomycin A3 staining
Sperm from seminal vesicles of 4 to five days previous virgin males with and with out wMel had been extracted on a microscope slide utilizing forceps and stuck in 3:1 vol/vol methanol:acetic acid at 4 °C for 20 min. Extra resolution was then eliminated, and the slide was air-dried. Every slide was handled at the hours of darkness for 20 min with 0.25 mg/ml of CMA3 in McIlvain’s buffer (pH 7.0), with 10 mM MgCl2. Sperm was then washed in 1× PBS, mounted, and imaged utilizing Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope. All photographs had been acquired with the identical parameters for every line and didn’t bear vital alteration. Fluorescence quantification was carried out by scoring fluorescent pixels in arbitrary items (A.U.) inside particular person sperm heads utilizing ImageJ software program as per the small print described in [116]. Particularly, an space of curiosity was manually drawn round particular person sperm head in each CMA3 and DAPI channels. “Analyze” operate was used to measure the world from DAPI channel and uncooked built-in density (RawIntDen) from CMA3 channel. RawIntDens is the entire sign depth of all of the pixels with that individual space that measured fluorescence CMA3 depth per sperm head. A corrected complete cell fluorescence (CTCF) was then calculated by dividing RawIntDens to the world and graphed. The overlapping sperm areas had been omitted from the quantification evaluation. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was decided by a pairwise comparability utilizing Mann—Whitney take a look at in GraphPad Prism 10.
Immunofluorescence: Ovaries
Virgin females (4 to five days previous) with no blood-feeding and 24 h put up blood-feeding with and with out wMel had been dissected to isolate ovaries. Mosquitoes had been fed defibrinated sheep blood for two h utilizing a Hemotek synthetic membrane feeding system heated to 37 °C (Hemotek, Lancashire, UK). Ovaries had been dissected in 1× PBS on ice and processed as beforehand [50]. Tissues had been incubated with main antibodies α-ftsZ (1:150) (a form reward from Dr. Irene Newton, Indiana College) to stain Wolbachia, α-CifA, and α-CifB (1:500) at 4 °C in a single day adopted by secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 594, 1:1,000) for 4 h at room temperature at the hours of darkness. Samples had been then rinsed and blocked once more earlier than incubating at 4 °C in a single day. After washing in 1× PBS-T 3 occasions, samples had been incubated with a secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 594) for 4 h at the hours of darkness. Tissues had been then washed 3 occasions for five min every in 1× PBS and mounted in Vectashield mounting media containing DAPI (Vector laboratories, Cat# H120010). Imaging was carried out with a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope.
Immunofluorescence: Embryos
Embryos with and with out wMel had been collected 0 to three h AED on moist filter paper substrate to seize first and subsequent mitotic division occasions [68]. To decelerate embryogenesis at preselected occasions, the moist filter paper was briefly held at 4 °C. The embryo bleaching and dechorionation protocol was developed from [117]. Briefly, the exochorion was eliminated by incubating embryos in 50% bleach for 40 s adopted by thorough rinsing with distilled water to take away all traces of bleach. The embryos had been then transferred to fixative resolution (1:1 4% paraformaldehyde and heptane) in a microcentrifuge tube and incubated in a 60 °C water tub for 30 min. Fixative was eliminated and changed with heptane pre-chilled at −80 °C. Embryos had been incubated at −80 °C for five min. After including room temperature methanol, embryos vials had been vigorously shaken underneath heat operating water for 30 s. The highest heptane layer and backside methanol layer was eliminated, and embryos had been washed 3 to 4 occasions with contemporary methanol to take away residual heptane. Fastened embryos had been saved at −20 °C till additional use.
Earlier than continuing to the immunofluorescence assay, the endochorion was manually peeled in accordance with beforehand established strategies [118]. Peeled embryos had been then rehydrated with 1× PBS for five min adopted by 2 occasions 10 min rinses in 1× PBS-T. Samples had been then blocked in 1% BSA in PBS-T for 1 h at room temperature. For samples incubated with 2 main antibodies generated in several host species, all staining and imaging steps had been carried out as for testes and ovary tissues detailed above. For the double-immunolabeling experiments wherein the two main antibodies had been generated in the identical host species (a-CifA and a-CifB in rabbit), we adopted beforehand established protocols [119,120]. Briefly, samples had been first incubated with the α-CifA antibody for 1 h at room temperature, rinsed 3 occasions for five min in PBS, and incubated in a single day at 4 °C with a DyLight 488-conjugated goat Fab’ fragment anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PE, USA) at a 1:100 dilution in PBS. Samples had been then rinsed 6 occasions for five min in PBS, incubated with α-CifB for 1 h at room temperature, rinsed 3 occasions for five min in PBS, after which incubated with a goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 594 secondary antibody for 4 h at the hours of darkness at room temperature. Samples had been then washed 3 occasions for five min every in 1× PBS and mounted in Vectashield mounting media containing DAPI (Vector laboratories, Cat# H120010). Imaging was carried out underneath Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope utilizing fixed publicity settings.
RNA isolation and qPCR: Embryos
Mosquito embryos with wMelM had been collected 0 to 2 h AED on moist filter paper substrate for RNA isolation. The collected samples had been instantly manually crushed with RNA-free pestles (USA Scientific, #1415–5390) in liquid nitrogen. RNA was extracted utilizing the Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep Package (Zymo) adopted by DNase remedy (Ambion, Life Applied sciences), and 1 μg of complete RNA was used to synthesize cDNA with SuperScript VILO equipment (Invitrogen, #11755250) and cDNA was diluted 1:10 utilizing Ambion nuclease-free water to be used in qPCR. qPCR was carried out on a QuantStudio 6 Professional Actual-Time PCR system utilizing PowerTrack SYBR Inexperienced Mastermix (Utilized Biosystems, #A46109) with the next situations: 50 °C 2 min, 95 °C 10 min, 40× (95 °C 15 s, 60 °C 30 s), 95 °C 15 s, 60 °C 1 min, 95 °C 15 s. cifA and cifB primers and Wolbachia-specific groEL gene primers had been used as described earlier [14,49]. Every response was run in 2 technical replicates. Expressions of cifA and cifB relative to groEL had been in contrast utilizing the two-ΔCt technique. Ct values above 30 had been omitted from the evaluation.
Supporting data
S1 Fig. CifA sometimes localize to mature sperm in wMel+ males. Cifs are absent in wMel- testes.
Testes (n = 10) from 4 to five days previous males of wild-type wMel+ and wMel- Ae. aegypti had been dissected and immunostained to visualise CifA (inexperienced) and CifB (pink) throughout sperm morphogenesis. DAPI stain (blue) labeled nuclei. (A) CifA was localized in puncta type to the mature sperm head in 1 out of 10 wMel+ testes examined. (B) Each CifA and CifB alerts are absent in wMel- management mosquito testes. The experiment was carried out in parallel to the one proven in Fig 1.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002573.s001
(TIF)
S2 Fig. Needle spermatids in wMel+ males abnormally retain histones relative to wMel- ones.
wMel+ and wMel- testes (n = 10) from 4 to five days previous virgin males had been dissected and immunostained to visualise and quantify core-histone abundance (magenta) in needle spermatids in Ae. aegypti. DAPI stain (blue) labeled spermatid nuclei. wMel+ males present extended histone retention within the type of puncta in condensing needle-stage spermatids, whereas histones are eliminated in wMel- males as anticipated. Stable arrow signifies somatic histone alerts forming testes with no differentiating alerts in wMel+ and wMel- testes, as anticipated. The dotted arrow exhibits histones particular to growing sperm underneath wMel+ an infection, that are the topic of this research. The photographs are associated to needle spermatid knowledge proven in Fig 2.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002573.s002
(TIF)
S3 Fig. CifA localizes in and across the nuclei in rescue embryos.
Associated to Fig 4, CifA localizes with nuclear DNA and surrounding cytoplasm of 8 daughter cells in rescue embryos collected at roughly 2 h AED throughout nuclear cycle 3. Upon increased publicity of DAPI channel in grey, the highest panel exhibits there’s an embedded nucleus (indicated by white arrow) of one other daughter cell that surfaces in a unique z-plane as proven within the backside panel.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002573.s003
(TIF)
S4 Fig. cifA gene expression is roughly 10-fold increased than cifB in early Ae. aegypti embryos.
Embryos from wMelM Wolbachia pressure aged 0–2 h AED had been examined for gene expression evaluation of cifA and cifB relative to Wolbachia groEL gene. Horizontal bars characterize median worth. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was decided by operating pairwise comparisons based mostly on Mann—Whitney U take a look at. All of the p-values are reported in S1 Table. Uncooked knowledge underlying this determine may be present in S1 Data file.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002573.s004
(TIF)
S5 Fig. Cifs and Wolbachia are absent in wMel- ovaries.
(A, B) Immunostaining assay exhibits that in each pre- (A) and post- (B) blood feeding, wMel- ovaries are devoid of any Wolbachia (pink), CifA (inexperienced), and CifB (yellow) alerts, as anticipated. The experiment was carried out in parallel to the one proven in Fig 6. We word autofluorescence noticed in pink, inexperienced, and yellow channels outlining the tissue morphology doesn’t signify Wolbachia, CifA, and CifB alerts, respectively.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002573.s005
(TIF)
S6 Fig. CifA sometimes localizes to nurse cell nuclei.
Immunostaining assay exhibits that in non-blood fed wMel+ females, CifA (in inexperienced) localize within the nuclei of germarium (ger), nurse cells (arrowheads), and oocyte (oo). Throughout the oocyte, CifA is current within the oocyte nucleus (on) inhabiting nucleoplasm house containing chromatin mass (ch) and a nucleolus (no). CifA colocalizes with chromatin exterior of the nucleolus space.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002573.s006
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
We’re grateful to Dr. Scott O’Neill (Monash College) for offering mosquito colonies used within the World Mosquito program for this experimental research and feedback on earlier variations of the manuscript. We thank Dr. Benjamin Loppin (ENS de Lyon, France) and Dr. Irene Newton (Indiana College, USA) for offering helpful suggestions on the immunostaining protocol, Heather Engler (Penn State College); Ary Hoffmann, Perran Ross, and Xinyue Gu (PEARG group, Bio21 Institute on the College of Melbourne) for rearing mosquitoes used within the embryo qPCR experiment; the Cell Imaging Shared Useful resource (Vanderbilt College); and the shared microscopy facility on the Huck Institute of Life Sciences (Penn State College) for imaging help. We thank Sarah Bordenstein and members of the Bordenstein lab for offering useful suggestions on the manuscript.
References
- 1.
Ricci I, Valzano M, Ulissi U, Epis S, Cappelli A, Favia G. Symbiotic management of mosquito borne illness. Pathog Glob Well being. 2012;106:380–385. pmid:23265608 - 2.
Teixeira L, Ferreira Á, Ashburner M. The bacterial symbiont Wolbachia induces resistance to RNA viral infections in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol. 2008;6:2753–2763. pmid:19222304 - 3.
Hedges LM, Brownlie JC, O’Neill SL, Johnson KN. Wolbachia and Virus Safety in Bugs. Science. 1979;2008(322):702–702. pmid:18974344 - 4.
Moreira LA, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Jeffery JA, Lu G, Pyke AT, Hedges LM, et al. A Wolbachia symbiont in Aedes aegypti limits an infection with dengue, Chikungunya, and Plasmodium. Cell. 2009;139:1268–1278. pmid:20064373 - 5.
van den Hurk AF, Corridor-Mendelin S, Pyke AT, Frentiu FD, McElroy Okay, Day A, et al. Impression of Wolbachia on An infection with Chikungunya and Yellow Fever Viruses within the Mosquito Vector Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012:6. pmid:23133693 - 6.
Caragata E, Dutra H, Moreira L. Inhibition of Zika virus by Wolbachia in Aedes aegypti. Microbial Cell. 2016;3:293–295. pmid:28357366 - 7.
Bian G, Xu Y, Lu P, Xie Y, Xi Z. The Endosymbiotic Bacterium Wolbachia Induces Resistance to Dengue Virus in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000833. pmid:20368968 - 8.
Terradas G, McGraw EA. Wolbachia-mediated virus blocking within the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2017;22:37–44. pmid:28805637 - 9.
Bhattacharya T, Newton ILG, Hardy RW. Viral RNA is a goal for Wolbachia-mediated pathogen blocking. PLoS Pathog. 2020. pmid:32555677 - 10.
Shropshire J, Leigh B, Bordenstein SR, Initiative M. Symbiont-mediated cytoplasmic incompatibility: What have we discovered in 50 years? Elife. 2020:1–51. pmid:32975515 - 11.
Breeuwer JAJ, Werren JH. Microorganisms related to chromosome destruction and reproductive isolation between two insect species. Nature. 1990. pmid:2377229 - 12.
Callaini G, Riparbelli MG, Giordano R, Dallai R. Mitotic defects related to cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans. J Invertebr Pathol. 1996;67:55–64. - 13.
Lassy CW, Karr TL. Cytological evaluation of fertilization and early embryonic growth in incompatible crosses of Drosophila simulans. Mech Dev. 1996;57:47–58. pmid:8817452 - 14.
LePage DP, Metcalf JA, Bordenstein SR, On J, Perlmutter JI, Shropshire JD, et al. Prophage WO genes recapitulate and improve Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility. Nature. 2017;543:243–247. pmid:28241146 - 15.
Reed KM, Werren JH. Induction of paternal genome loss by the paternal-sex-ratio chromosome and cytoplasmic incompatibility micro organism (Wolbachia): A comparative research of early embryonic occasions. Mol Reprod Dev. 1995. pmid:7598906 - 16.
Ryan SL, Saul GB. Submit-fertilization impact of incompatibility elements in Mormoniella. Mol Gen Genet. 1968;103:29–36. pmid:5753233 - 17.
Tram U, Fredrick Okay, Werren JH, Sullivan W. Paternal chromosome segregation throughout the first mitotic division determines Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility phenotype. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:3655–3663. pmid:16912076 - 18.
Warecki B, Titen SWA, Alam MS, Vega G, Lemseffer N, Hug Okay, et al. Wolbachia motion within the sperm produces developmentally deferred chromosome segregation defects throughout the Drosophila mid-blastula transition. Elife. 2022:11. pmid:36149408 - 19.
Turelli M, Hoffmann AA. Speedy unfold of an inherited incompatibility think about California Drosophila. Nature. 1991;353:440–442. pmid:1896086 - 20.
Turelli M. Evolution of incompatibility-inducing microbes and their hosts. Evolution (N Y). 1994;48:1500–1513. pmid:28568404 - 21.
Weinert LA, Araujo-Jnr EV, Ahmed MZ, Welch JJ. The incidence of bacterial endosymbionts in terrestrial arthropods. Proc Biol Sci. 2015;282:20150249–20150249. pmid:25904667 - 22.
Zug R, Hammerstein P. Nonetheless a number of hosts for Wolbachia: Evaluation of current knowledge means that 40% of terrestrial arthropod species are contaminated. PLoS ONE. 2012:7. pmid:22685581 - 23.
Walker T, Johnson PH, Moreira LA, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Frentiu FD, McMeniman CJ, et al. The wMel Wolbachia pressure blocks dengue and invades caged Aedes aegypti populations. Nature. 2011;476:450–455. pmid:21866159 - 24.
Gu X, Ross PA, Rodriguez-Andres J, Robinson KL, Yang Q, Lau M, et al. A w Mel Wolbachia variant in Aedes aegypti from field-collected Drosophila melanogaster with elevated phenotypic stability underneath warmth stress. Environ Microbiol. 2022;24:2119–2135. pmid:35319146 - 25.
Hoffmann AA, Montgomery BL, Popovici J, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Johnson PH, Muzzi F, et al. Profitable institution of Wolbachia in Aedes populations to suppress dengue transmission. Nature. 2011;476:454–457. pmid:21866160 - 26.
Flores HA, O’Neill SL. Controlling vector-borne illnesses by releasing modified mosquitoes. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:508–518. pmid:29777177 - 27.
Gesto JSM, Pinto SB, Dias FBS, Peixoto J, Costa G, Kutcher S, et al. Massive-Scale Deployment and Institution of Wolbachia Into the Aedes aegypti Inhabitants in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Entrance Microbiol. 2021:12. pmid:34394061 - 28.
Hoffmann AA, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Callahan AG, Phillips BL, Billington Okay, Axford JK, et al. Stability of the wMel Wolbachia An infection following Invasion into Aedes aegypti Populations. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014. pmid:25211492 - 29.
Utarini A, Indriani C, Ahmad RA, Tantowijoyo W, Arguni E, Ansari MR, et al. Efficacy of Wolbachia-infected mosquito deployments for the management of dengue. N Engl J Med. 2021. pmid:34107180 - 30.
Indriani C, Tantowijoyo W, Rancès E, Andari B, Prabowo E, Yusdi D, et al. Diminished Dengue Incidence Following Deployments of Wolbachia-Contaminated Aedes aegypti in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. SSRN Electron J. 2020. - 31.
Joubert DA, Walker T, Carrington LB, De Bruyne JT, Kien DHT, Hoang NLT, et al. Institution of a Wolbachia Superinfection in Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes as a Potential Method for Future Resistance Administration. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:1–19. pmid:26891349 - 32.
Nazni WA, Hoffmann AA, NoorAfizah A, Cheong YL, Mancini MV, Golding N, et al. Institution of Wolbachia Pressure wAlbB in Malaysian Populations of Aedes aegypti for Dengue Management. Curr Biol. 2019. pmid:31761702 - 33.
Ryan PA, Turley AP, Wilson G, Hurst TP, Retzki Okay, Brown-Kenyon J, et al. Institution of wMel Wolbachia in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes and discount of native dengue transmission in Cairns and surrounding areas in northern Queensland, Australia. Gates Open Res. 2020. pmid:31667465 - 34.
Ross PA, Robinson KL, Yang Q, Callahan AG, Schmidt TL, Axford JK, et al. A decade of stability for wMel Wolbachia in pure Aedes aegypti populations. PLoS Pathog. 2022:18. pmid:35196357 - 35.
Shropshire JD, Hamant E, Cooper BS. Male Age and Wolbachia Dynamics: Investigating How Quick and Why Bacterial Densities and Cytoplasmic Incompatibility Strengths Fluctuate. MBio. 2021:12. pmid:34903056 - 36.
Calvitti M, Marini F, Desiderio A, Puggioli A, Moretti R. Wolbachia density and cytoplasmic incompatibility in Aedes albopictus: Issues with utilizing synthetic Wolbachia an infection as a vector suppression software. PLoS ONE. 2015:10. pmid:25812130 - 37.
Reynolds KT, Thomson LJ, Hoffmann AA. The results of host age, host nuclear background and temperature on phenotypic results of the virulent Wolbachia a pressure popcorn in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2003;164:1027–1034. pmid:8511587 - 38.
Reynolds KT, Hoffmann AA. Male age, host results and the weak expression or non-expression of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila strains contaminated by maternally transmitted Wolbachia. Genet Res (Camb). 2002;80:79–87. pmid:12534211 - 39.
Yamada R, Floate KD, Riegler M, O’Neill SL. Male growth time influences the power of Wolbachia -induced cytoplasmic incompatibility expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2007;177:801–808. pmid:17660578 - 40.
Ritchie IT, Needles KT, Leigh BA, Kaur R, Bordenstein SR. Transgenic cytoplasmic incompatibility persists throughout age and temperature variation in Drosophila melanogaster. iScience. 2022;25:105327. pmid:36304111 - 41.
Bordenstein SR, Bordenstein SR. Temperature impacts the tripartite interactions between bacteriophage WO, Wolbachia, and cytoplasmic incompatibility. PLoS ONE. 2011:6. pmid:22194999 - 42.
Ross PA, Axford JK, Yang Q, Staunton KM, Ritchie SA, Richardson KM, et al. Heatwaves trigger fluctuations in wMel Wolbachia densities and frequencies in aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:1–18. pmid:31971938 - 43.
Nasehi SF, Fathipour Y, Asgari S, Mehrabadi M. Environmental Temperature, however Not Male Age, Impacts Wolbachia and Prophage WO Thereby Modulating Cytoplasmic Incompatibility within the Parasitoid Wasp, Habrobracon Hebetor. Microb Ecol. 2022;83:482–491. pmid:33969432 - 44.
Clark ME, Veneti Z, Bourtzis Okay, Karr TL. Wolbachia distribution and cytoplasmic incompatibility throughout sperm growth: the cyst as the essential mobile unit of CI expression. 2003;120:185–198. - 45.
Layton EM, On J, Perlmutter JI, Bordenstein SR, Shropshire JD. Paternal grandmother age impacts the power of Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila melanogaster. MBio. 2019:10. pmid:31690673 - 46.
Merçot H, Charlat S. Wolbachia infections in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: Polymorphism and ranges of cytoplasmic incompatibility. Genetica. 2004:51–59. pmid:15088646 - 47.
Chafee ME, Zecher CN, Gourley ML, Schmidt VT, Chen JH, Bordenstein SR, et al. Decoupling of host-symbiont-phage coadaptations following switch between insect species. Genetics. 2011;187:203–215. pmid:20944019 - 48.
Shropshire JD, On J, Layton EM, Zhou H, Bordenstein SR. One prophage WO gene rescues cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:4987–4991. pmid:29686091 - 49.
Shropshire JD, Bordenstein SR. Two-by-one mannequin of cytoplasmic incompatibility: Artificial recapitulation by transgenic expression of cifa and cifb in drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2019:15. pmid:31242186 - 50.
Kaur R, Leigh BA, Ritchie IT, Bordenstein SR. The Cif proteins from Wolbachia prophage WO modify sperm genome integrity to determine cytoplasmic incompatibility. PLoS Biol. 2022:20. pmid:35609042 - 51.
Horard B, Terretaz Okay, Gosselin-Grenet A-S, Sobry H, Sicard M, Landmann F, et al. Paternal transmission of the Wolbachia CidB toxin underlies cytoplasmic incompatibility. Curr Biol. 2022. pmid:35134330 - 52.
Harumoto T, Fukatsu T. Perplexing dynamics of Wolbachia proteins for cytoplasmic incompatibility. PLoS Biol. 2022:20. pmid:35613073 - 53.
Wang W, Cui W, Yang H. Towards an correct mechanistic understanding of Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility. Environ Microbiol. 2022. pmid:35859330 - 54.
Wandall A. Ultrastructural group of spermatocysts within the testes of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 1986;23:374–379. pmid:3735341 - 55.
Clements AN. The Biology of Mosquitoes. Quantity 1. Growth, Vitamin and Copy. 2000. - 56.
Rathke C, Baarends WM, Awe S, Renkawitz-Pohl R. Chromatin dynamics throughout spermiogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2014;1839:155–168. pmid:24091090 - 57.
Awe S, Renkawitz-Pohl R. Histone H4 Acetylation is Important to Proceed from a Histone- to a Protamine-based Chromatin Construction in Spermatid Nuclei of Drosophila melanogaster. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2010;56:44–61. pmid:20170286 - 58.
Cho C, Jung-Ha H, Willis WD, Goulding EH, Stein P, Xu Z, et al. Protamine 2 deficiency results in sperm DNA injury and embryo dying in mice. Biol Reprod. 2003;69:211–217. pmid:12620939 - 59.
Bonilla E, Xu EY. Identification and characterization of novel mammalian spermatogenic genes conserved from fly to human. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14:137–142. pmid:18256174 - 60.
Baxevanis AD, Landsman D. Histone sequence database: A compilation of highly-conserved nucleoprotein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24:245–247. pmid:8594591 - 61.
Lolis D, Georgiou I, Syrrou M, Zikopoulos Okay, Konstantelli M, Messinis I. Chromomycin A3-staining as an indicator of protamine deficiency and fertilization. Int J Androl. 1996;19:23–27. pmid:8698534 - 62.
Pascini TV, Ramalho-Ortigão M, Martins GF. Morphological and morphometrical evaluation of spermathecae of aedes aegypti females. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012;107:705–712. pmid:22990957 - 63.
Tram U, Sullivan W. Function of delayed nuclear envelope breakdown and mitosis in Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility. Science. 1979;2002(296):1124–1126. pmid:12004132 - 64.
Callaini G, Dallai R, Riparbelli MG. Wolbachia-induced delay of paternal chromatin condensation doesn’t stop maternal chromosomes from getting into anaphase in incompatible crosses of Drosophila simulans. J Cell Sci. 1997;110(Pt 2):271–280. - 65.
Bonneau M, Landmann F, Labbé P, Justy F, Weill M, Sicard M. The mobile phenotype of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Culex pipiens within the gentle of cidB variety. PLoS Pathog. 2018:14. pmid:30321239 - 66.
Duron O, Weill M. Wolbachia an infection influences the event of Culex pipiens embryo in incompatible crosses. Heredity (Edinb). 2006;96:493–500. pmid:16639421 - 67.
Wright JD, Barr AR. Wolbachia and the conventional and incompatible eggs of Aedes polynesiensis (Diptera: Culicidae). J Invertebr Pathol. 1981;38:409–418. - 68.
Raminani LN, Cupp EW. Early embryology of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). Int J Insect Morphol Embryol. 1975;4:517–528. - 69.
Adams KL, Abernathy DG, Willett BC, Selland EK. Wolbachia cifB induces cytoplasmic incompatibility within the malaria mosquito. 2021. - 70.
Laurence BR. Ovary growth in mosquitoes: a evaluation. 1977. - 71.
Valzania L, Mattee MT, Strand MR, Brown MR. Blood feeding prompts the vitellogenic stage of oogenesis within the mosquito Aedes aegypti by means of inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase 3 by the insulin and TOR pathways. Dev Biol. 2019;454:85–95. pmid:31153832 - 72.
Raikhel AS, Dhadialla TS. Accumulation of yolk proteins in insect oocytes. Annu Rev Entomol. 1992;37:217–251. pmid:1311540 - 73.
Gulia-Nuss M, Robertson AE, Brown MR, Strand MR. Insulin-like peptides and the goal of rapamycin pathway coordinately regulate blood digestion and egg maturation within the mosquito Aedes aegypti. PLoS ONE. 2011:6. pmid:21647424 - 74.
Very important W, Rezende GL, Abreu L, Moraes J, Lemos FJ, Vaz IDS, et al. Germ band retraction as a landmark in glucose metabolism throughout Aedes aegypti embryogenesis. BMC Dev Biol. 2010:10. pmid:20184739 - 75.
Fiil A. Structural and purposeful modifications of the nucleus throughout oogenesis within the mosquito Aedes aegypti. J Cell Sci. 1974;14:51–67. pmid:4856243 - 76.
Roth TF, Porter KR. Yolk Protein Uptake within the Oocyte of the Mosquito Aedes Aegypti. L J Cell Biol. 1964;20:313–332. pmid:14126875 - 77.
Telfer WH. The Mechanism and Management of Yolk Formation. Annu Rev Entomol. 1965;10:161–184. - 78.
Zimowska G, Shirk PD, Silhacek DL, Shaaya E. Vitellin and formation of yolk spheres in vitellogenic follicles of the moth, Plodia interpunctella. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 1995;29:71–85. - 79.
Dearden PK. Germ cell growth within the Honeybee (Apis mellifera); Vasa and Nanos expression. BMC Dev Biol. 2006:6. pmid:16503992 - 80.
Li T, Hong X, Gong J, Li Y, Li T, Liang Y, et al. Steady Introduction of Plant-Virus-Inhibiting Wolbachia into Planthoppers for Rice Safety. Curr Biol. 2020. pmid:33035486 - 81.
Rathke C, Baarends WM, Jayaramaiah-Raja S, Bartkuhn M, Renkawitz R, Renkawitz-Pohl R. Transition from a nucleosome-based to a protamine-based chromatin configuration throughout spermiogenesis in Drosophila. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:1689–1700. pmid:17452629 - 82.
Ribas-Maynou J, Garcia-Bonavila E, Hidalgo CO, Catalán J, Miró J, Yeste M. Species-Particular Variations in Sperm Chromatin Decondensation Between Eutherian Mammals Underlie Distinct Lysis Necessities. Entrance Cell Dev Biol. 2021:9. pmid:33996825 - 83.
Kasinsky HE, Gowen BE, Ausió J. Spermiogenic chromatin condensation patterning in a number of hexapods might contain section separation dynamics by spinodal decomposition or microemulsion inversion (nucleation). Tissue Cell. 2021:73. pmid:34537592 - 84.
Degner EC, Harrington LC. A mosquito sperm’s journey from male ejaculate to egg: Mechanisms, molecules, and strategies for exploration. Mol Reprod Dev. 2016;83:897–911. pmid:27147424 - 85.
Clements AN, Potter SA. The effective construction of the spermathecae and their ducts within the mosquito Aedes aegypti. J Insect Physiol. 1967;13:1825–1836. pmid:6081062 - 86.
Ndiaye M, Mattei X, Thiaw OT. Maturation of mosquito spermatozoa throughout their transit all through the female and male reproductive programs. Tissue Cell. 1997;29:675–678. pmid:18627833 - 87.
Yudin AI, Treece CA, Tollner TL, Overstreet JW, Cherr GN. The carbohydrate construction of DEFB126, the most important part of the cynomolgus macaque sperm plasma membrane glycocalyx. J Membr Biol. 2005;207:119–129. pmid:16550483 - 88.
Toshimori Okay, Araki S, Öra C, Eddy EM. Lack of sperm floor sialic acid induces phagocytosis: An assay with a monoclonal antibody T21, which acknowledges a 54K sialoglycoprotein. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 1991;27:79–86. pmid:1953200 - 89.
Noble JM, Degner EC, Harrington LC, Kourkoutis LF. Cryo-Electron Microscopy Reveals That Sperm Modification Coincides with Feminine Fertility within the Mosquito Aedes aegypti. Sci Rep. 2019:9. pmid:31811199 - 90.
Degrugillier ME, Leopold RA. Ultrastructure of sperm penetration of home fly eggs. J Ultrasruct Res. 1976;56:312–325. pmid:986479 - 91.
McPherson S, Longo FJ. Chromatin structure-function alterations throughout mammalian spermatogenesis: DNA nicking and restore in elongating spermatids. Eur J Histochem. 1993;37:109–128. pmid:7688597 - 92.
Marchetti F, Bishop JB, Cosentino L, Moore D, Wyrobek AJ. Paternally Transmitted Chromosomal Aberrations in Mouse Zygotes Decide Their Embryonic Destiny. Biol Reprod. 2004;70:616–624. pmid:14585809 - 93.
Marchetti F, Wyrobek AJ. Mechanisms and penalties of paternally-transmitted chromosomal abnormalities. Delivery Defects Res C Embryo At the moment. 2005;75:112–129. pmid:16035041 - 94.
Aitken RJ, Baker MA. Causes and penalties of apoptosis in spermatozoa; contributions to infertility and impacts on growth. Int J Dev Biol. 2013;57:265–272. pmid:23784837 - 95.
Nasr-Esfahani MH, Salehi M, Razavi S, Anjomshoa M, Rozbahani S, Moulavi F, et al. Impact of sperm DNA injury and sperm protamine deficiency on fertilization and embryo growth post-ICSI. Reprod Biomed On-line. 2005;11:198–205. pmid:16168218 - 96.
Evenson DP, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR. Relation of mammalian sperm chromatin heterogeneity to fertility. Science. 1979;1980(210):1131–1133. pmid:7444440 - 97.
Derijck A, van der Heijden G, Giele M, Philippens M, De boer P. DNA double-strand break restore in parental chromatin of mouse zygotes, the primary cell cycle as an origin of de novo mutation. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:1922–1937. pmid:18353795 - 98.
Ménézo Y, Dale B, Cohen M. DNA injury and restore in human oocytes and embryos: A evaluation. Zygote. 2010;18:357–365. pmid:20663262 - 99.
Gawecka JE, Marh J, Ortega M, Yamauchi Y, Ward MA, Ward WS. Mouse Zygotes Reply to Extreme Sperm DNA Injury by Delaying Paternal DNA Replication and Embryonic Growth. PLoS ONE. 2013:8. pmid:23431372 - 100.
Landmann F, Orsi GA, Loppin B, Sullivan W. Wolbachia-mediated cytoplasmic incompatibility is related to impaired histone deposition within the male pronucleus. PLoS Pathog. 2009:5. pmid:19300496 - 101.
Kaur R, Shropshire J, Leigh BA, Bordenstein SR. Nuclease proteins CifA and CifB promote spermatid DNA injury related to symbiont-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility. bioRxiv. 2022. - 102.
Jenkins TG, Carrell DT. Dynamic alterations within the paternal epigenetic panorama following fertilization. Entrance Genet. 2012:3. pmid:23024648 - 103.
Jenkins TG, Carrell DT. The sperm epigenome and potential implications for the growing embryo. Copy. 2012;143:727–734. pmid:22495887 - 104.
Ferree PM, Sullivan W. A genetic take a look at of the position of the maternal pronucleus in Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2006;173:839–847. pmid:16624919 - 105.
Pan X, Zhou G, Wu J, Bian G, Lu P, Raikhel AS, et al. Wolbachia induces reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent activation of the Toll pathway to regulate dengue virus within the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:E23–E31. pmid:22123956 - 106.
Ashwood-Smith MJ, Edwards RG. DNA restore by oocytes. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996;2:46–51. pmid:9238657 - 107.
Zeng F, Baldwin DA, Schultz RM. Transcript profiling throughout preimplantation mouse growth. Dev Biol. 2004;272:483–496. pmid:15282163 - 108.
Bonneau M, Landmann F, Labbé P, Justy F, Weill M, Sicard M. The mobile phenotype of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Culex pipiens within the gentle of cidB variety. McGraw EA, editor. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1007364. pmid:30321239 - 109.
Brandriff B, Pedersen RA. Restore of the ultraviolet-irradiated male genome in fertilized mouse eggs. Science. 1979;1981(212):1431–1433. pmid:7466400 - 110.
Shropshire JD, Rosenberg R, Bordenstein SR. The impacts of cytoplasmic incompatibility issue (cifA and cifB) genetic variation on phenotypes. Genetics. 2021. pmid:33683351 - 111.
Beckmann JF, Ronau JA, Hochstrasser M. A Wolbachia deubiquitylating enzyme induces cytoplasmic incompatibility. Nat Microbiol. 2017:2. pmid:28248294 - 112.
Solar G, Zhang M, Chen H, Hochstrasser M. The CinB Nuclease from w No Wolbachia Is Ample for Induction of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility in Drosophila. MBio. 2022:13. pmid:35073749 - 113.
Cooper BS, Ginsberg PS, Turelli M, Matute DR. Wolbachia within the Drosophila yakuba advanced: Pervasive frequency variation and weak cytoplasmic incompatibility, however no obvious impact on reproductive isolation. Genetics. 2017;205:333–351. pmid:27821433 - 114.
Poinsot D, Bourtzis Okay, Markakis G, Savakis C, Merçot H. Wolbachia switch from Drosophila melanogaster into D. simulans: Host impact and cytoplasmic incompatibility relationships. Genetics. 1998. pmid:9725842 - 115.
Zabalou S, Apostolaki A, Pattas S, Veneti Z, Paraskevopoulos C, Livadaras I, et al. A number of rescue elements inside a Wolbachia pressure. Genetics. 2008;178:2145–2160. pmid:18430940 - 116.
Kaur R, Martinez J, Rota-Stabelli O, Jiggins FM, Miller WJ. Age, tissue, genotype and virus an infection regulate Wolbachia ranges in Drosophila. Mol Ecol. 2020;29:2063–2079. pmid:32391935 - 117.
Clemons A, Haugen M, Flannery E, Tomchaney M, Kast Okay, Jacowski C, et al. Aedes aegypti: An rising mannequin for vector mosquito growth. Chilly Spring Harb Protoc. 2010;5. pmid:20889691 - 118.
Juhn J, James AA. Hybridization in situ of salivary glands, ovaries, and embryos of vector mosquitoes. J Vis Exp. 2012:1–18. pmid:22781778 - 119.
Web page J, Berríos S, Rufas JS, Parra MT, Suja JÁ, Heyting C, et al. The pairing of X and Y chromosomes throughout meiotic prophase within the marsupial species Thylamys elegans is maintained by a dense plate developed from their axial parts. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:551–560. pmid:12508115 - 120.
Viera A, Parra MT, Arévalo S, de la Vega CG, Santos JL, Web page J. X chromosome inactivation throughout grasshopper spermatogenesis. Genes (Basel). 2021:12. pmid:34946793